Tea Party activists shout racial slurs at Congressmen

[Standard]

Personally, had I been there and recorded some fool in the crowd shouting racial epithets, I would have promptly 1.Clubbed the fool 2.Exited the scene in a hasty manner 3. Sold my video to the highest bidder 4. Remove the license plates from my car, thereby abandoning it 5. Buy an airline ticket home( first class) 6. Purchase a new Cadillac 7. Sell my house, taking my one time capital gains exclusion 8. Buy a new brick home with aluminum clad windows and aluminum wrapped soffit and fascia 9. Buy a substantial amount of NewsCorp. stock 10. PAY THE TAXES on my video reward. 11. Donate money to my local 9-12 Patriot chapter 12. Continue to enjoy my full life. .

Yes, good old free market entrepreneurship by golly.

[gmg77]

I am not the only conservative member on this forum and your expressed association between 9-12 patriots and hate groups not only hurts me, but many others on this forum, as well. Please tone down your rhetoric and stick with the facts.

You conservatives are so sensitive.

Sorry I didnt link for the video just the fact that a brick was thrown against Obamacare. I couldn't hear anything in the video either,but lack of video evidence doesn't make it untrue. My point is stoking these flames makes the nuts mis-behave yell baby killer,fa**ot, spitting, bricks and racial epitaphs seems to be a pattern? It may be the fringe but you do no service to your cause by defending them.

Here is a image from the 1959 kinda looks similar? Wonder why a communism/socialism are thrown around so easy?

[WT Reader]

Very apropos remarks and photo, GMG. You see, the reason Health Care Reform stirs so much hatred and white hot anger among so many is that IS all about Civil Rights.

Yes, Civil Rights for the sick, the poor and the disabled. And so many hate those who are sick, poor and disabled. This is because they deem themselves as superior, and have never known REAL sickness, povery or disability.

It is all about hatred of those they deem "weak"... "inferior" ... and unlike Them, The Strong Ones.

What Civil Rights was in the 1950s and 1960s, Health Care for all is for the 2010s !

Interesting, too, isn't it...how so many who are vocally and deeply opposed to Health Care Reform are so often also against our President, a man of color??

-- WT Reader

[ClassicalLib17]

gmg77 says: Sorry I didnt link for the video just the fact that a brick was thrown against Obamacare. I couldn't hear anything in the video either,but lack of video evidence doesn't make it untrue. My point is stoking these flames makes the nuts mis-behave yell baby killer,fa**ot, spitting, bricks and racial epitaphs seems to be a pattern? It may be the fringe but you do no service to your cause by defending them.

Here is a image from the 1959 kinda looks similar? Wonder why a communism/socialism are thrown around so easy?
gmg77

Maybe Louise tossed the brick herself? That assertion is just as credible as yours, don't you think? I bet if you checked the political affiliation of the people in your posted 1950's photo you would find them ALL to be DEMOCRAT supporters. Why do you continue to foment racial discord in order to further your Progressive political agenda? Don't I have a right to post alternative opinions without being attacked and baited by those of you that believe in a Collectivist form of government? I can forgive you if you had been fed the wrong history lesson. I realize there are communist sympathizers within the ranks of the teacher's union. If you need help because you are confused about what you have been told, and deep down inside you feel that you have been led astray, please feel free to send me a private message. I will do what I can to bring you back into the light. God bless you.

[WT Reader]

gmg77 says: Sorry I didnt link for the video just the fact that a brick was thrown against Obamacare. I couldn't hear anything in the video either,but lack of video evidence doesn't make it untrue. My point is stoking these flames makes the nuts mis-behave yell baby killer,fa**ot, spitting, bricks and racial epitaphs seems to be a pattern? It may be the fringe but you do no service to your cause by defending them.

Here is a image from the 1959 kinda looks similar? Wonder why a communism/socialism are thrown around so easy?
gmg77

Maybe Louise tossed the brick herself? That assertion is just as credible as yours, don't you think? I bet if you checked the political affiliation of the people in your posted 1950's photo you would find them ALL to be DEMOCRAT supporters. xoxoxoxo Why do you continue to foment racial discord in order to further your Progressive political agenda? Why do you feel personally threatened by factual information that does not further your own personal desires?

You use the term "progressive" a lot. I would be curious to learn how you define a "progressive" and a "Progressive political agenda."

And what evidence do you have that "ALL" those photographed in the above photo are "DEMOCRAT supporters"?

-- WT Reader

[ClassicalLib17]

WT Reader says: You use the term "progressive" a lot. I would be curious to learn how you define a "progressive" and a "Progressive political agenda."

And what evidence do you have that "ALL" those photographed in the above photo are "DEMOCRAT supporters"?

I define a Progressive by the words of President Obama's own " Regulatory Czar" Cass Sunstein. I feel proud to be the one that provides you with the information that will lead to your enlightenment. May God Bless you and your family.


In 2004 Sunstein authored a book entitled "The Second Bill of Rights: FDR's Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need It More than Ever". The Second Bill of Rights was laid out by FDR in his 11th State of the Union Address in 1944 as a means to “assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.” Equal outcomes, or as liberal newspeak has it, “level the playing field.” FDR listed these state guaranteed “rights” as:


“The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation; The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation; The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living; The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad; The right of every family to a decent home; The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health; The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment; The right to a good education.”

Each of these is a goal, something to strive for; the original Bill of Rights ensures we are able to strive for them, without the interference of government. Americans were the first people in the history of mankind to recognize that a higher power, our Creator and NOT our government, or our King, has endowed each of us with the liberties necessary to pursue these worthy goals. According to Sunstein, that is where we went wrong:


“…there are no "natural" rights - all rights are the product of government, defined by government, enforced by government, and protected by government. The "right" to ownership of property, for example, which most people think of as a primal right inherent to all who are born into society, is actually a product of law.”

According to Sunstein rights are a product of law, or more correctly, of the government that writes the law. Rather than being “endowed by our Creator” with liberties beyond the reach of government, we are endowed with our rights by our government. Sunstein would have us, to borrow from Thomas Jefferson, endowed by those “favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them [the mass of mankind] legitimately, by the grace of God.” Sunstein has even higher aspirations for his tyrannical theories on the origin of rights.

[gmg77]

They probably are Democrats. So? Southern strategy? I don't affiliate with either party. Both are clueless.

"Progressive" is 2010 for the 1994 "liberal". Its Glenn Beck speak, progressive=cancer on american society. Like being liberal, demcratatic party or progressive is unamerican. It helps with the us vs them mentality of 9/12ers. They like to think its derogatory and label anyone who disagrees with their world view.

24 hours have passed and not one lucky American, or Progressive has come forward to collect their prize.

[ClassicalLib17]

gmg77 says:"Progressive" is 2010 for the 1994 "liberal". Its Glenn Beck speak, progressive=cancer on american society. Like being liberal, demcratatic party or progressive is unamerican. It helps with the us vs them mentality of 9/12ers. They like to think its derogatory and label anyone who disagrees with their world view.

I love my country as defined by our founding fathers. What is wrong with that?

[Danno]

They probably are Democrats. So? Southern strategy? I don't affiliate with either party. Both are clueless.

"Progressive" is 2010 for the 1994 "liberal". Its Glenn Beck speak, progressive=cancer on american society. Like being liberal, demcratatic party or progressive is unamerican. It helps with the us vs them mentality of 9/12ers. They like to think its derogatory and label anyone who disagrees with their world view.

24 hours have passed and not one lucky American, or Progressive has come forward to collect their prize.

Very good observation about the "us vs them" mentality. That has been used for centuries. It tends to keep things nice and simple for the simple minded.

[Danno]

gmg77 says:"Progressive" is 2010 for the 1994 "liberal". Its Glenn Beck speak, progressive=cancer on american society. Like being liberal, demcratatic party or progressive is unamerican. It helps with the us vs them mentality of 9/12ers. They like to think its derogatory and label anyone who disagrees with their world view.

I love my country as defined by our founding fathers. What is wrong with that?

Can you elaborate? Didn't they define a country which permitted slave ownership and only allowed white male property owners to vote? Are you saying it should still be that way?