Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Honor Bound-- The Oath of Enlistment's Clever Trap
#2
Sooo what does the cited author of this work, Mr. Chris Cart, mean in the last paragraph "The President is no longer my Commander-in-Chief." ??

Last I heard, President Obama was ELECTED to the Presidency by The American People. He did not "take over" he was ELECTED.


Further, it is very clear from this article that Mr. Carter takes his oath as a former member of the U S Military "to support and defend the U S Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic" as legitimate grounds for him and all other U S Military veterans to rise up and harm the President of the United States.

Just who is Mr. Carter to arbitrarily and capriciously ON HIS OWN decide that President Obama is an Enemy of the U S Constitution and no longer his
"Commander-in-Chief" worthy of armed attack??
No Judge and Jury here, Mr. Carter seems to see only Hmself and Like-Minded Veterans and Supporters as THE SUPREME ARBITERS of RIGHT and WRONG in these here United States.

And ClassicalLib, by your very posting of this article by Mr. Carter and then your comment above which reads "I thank the good lord for our brave men and women serving our country in the armed forces, for they understand the true essence of public service" mean that you support such Mr. Carter in his very implied call for armed insurrection against the the duly elected President of the United States?

Will you answer this or follow your typical M O by just cutting and pasting more and more articles to flood this thread to "bury" my question to purposefully prevent further discussion of your apparant advocacy of seditious, anarchistic and violent activity against the duly elected President of the United States of America ?????

:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:

-- WT Reader
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Honor Bound-- The Oath of Enlistment's Clever Trap - by WT Reader - 05-14-2010, 11:29 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)