04-18-2010, 04:00 PM
ClassicalLib17 Wrote:Angry? I'm not angry. I'm also not an economist, scientist, engineer, or a doctor, etc. I prefer to read the truth and then spread the word. Take a look at my contributions to this forum and I think you will see that it is you who chooses to inject anger and false charges of racism to try to discredit the truth that the once silent majority of Americans are now awakening to. Personally, I wish you would simply read my posts with an open mind and try to cleanse yourself of your self destructive animosity towards conservative opinion and common sense, in general. Obfuscate? Not me, that's been your domain(cogent commentary.) Why attack me for posting Star Parker's commentary? Might she be a racist and I am just naive? Here's your opportunity to post some cogent commentary to Star Parker's opinion.
You posted it, want to hear your cogent commentary upon it. I have already posted three posts here, one on a lawsuit against California State University by an open gov group in California about taxpayers funding the upcoming costly and extravagant excesses of Sister Sarah Palin's scheduled speech...with cogent commentary, not just a blank opinion pice, actual REAl NEWS.
I also posted a pice about a recent CBS NEWS/NY TIMES poll as to who the majority of "Tea Party" activists are who are white, conservative, older and very angry...only 18% of the American public with only 1% of them being people of color. OH, and yes, with cogent commentary.
And I posted a piece about "DON'T FUEL UNHINGED" based upon recent comments President Clinton has made about his concerns for growing violence from the fringe "Tea Party" activists and how they compare to Timothy McVeigh in 1995 and his Oklahoma City BOMBING....with cogent commentary.
So let's hear your cogent commentary on the Parker article you posted here rather than just another cut and paste jobber which you so excel at mostly filling this entire politcal thread.
-- WT Reader