Waukegan Talk

Full Version: Back on Uncle Sam's Plantation
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
February 09, 2009
Back on Uncle Sam's Plantation
by Star Parker



Six years ago I wrote a book called "Uncle Sam's Plantation." I wrote the book to tell my own story of what I saw living inside the welfare state and my own transformation out of it.





I said in that book that indeed there are two Americas. A poor America on socialism and a wealthy America on capitalism.

I talked about government programs like Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training (JOBS), Emergency Assistance to Needy Families with Children (EANF), Section 8 Housing, and Food Stamps.

A vast sea of perhaps well intentioned government programs, all initially set into motion in the 1960's, that were going to lift the nation's poor out of poverty.

A benevolent Uncle Sam welcomed mostly poor black Americans onto the government plantation. Those who accepted the invitation switched mindsets from "How do I take care of myself?" to "What do I have to do to stay on the plantation?"

Instead of solving economic problems, government welfare socialism created monstrous moral and spiritual problems. The kind of problems that are inevitable when individuals turn responsibility for their lives over to others.

The legacy of American socialism is our blighted inner cities, dysfunctional inner city schools, and broken black families.

Through God's grace, I found my way out. It was then that I understood what freedom meant and how great this country is.

I had the privilege of working on welfare reform in 1996, passed by a Republican congress and signed into law by a Democrat president. A few years after enactment, welfare roles were down fifty percent.

I thought we were on the road to moving socialism out of our poor black communities and replacing it with wealth producing American capitalism.

But, incredibly, we are going in the opposite direction.

Instead of poor America on socialism becoming more like rich American on capitalism, rich America on capitalism is becoming like poor America on socialism.

Uncle Sam has welcomed our banks onto the plantation and they have said, "Thank you, Suh."

Now, instead of thinking about what creative things need to be done to serve customers, they are thinking about what they have to tell Massah in order to get their cash.

There is some kind of irony that this is all happening under our first black president on the 200th anniversary of the birthday of Abraham Lincoln.

Worse, socialism seems to be the element of our new young president. And maybe even more troubling, our corporate executives seem happy to move onto the plantation.

In an op-ed on the opinion page of the Washington Post, Mr. Obama is clear that the goal of his trillion dollar spending plan is much more than short term economic stimulus.

"This plan is more than a prescription for short-term spending-it's a strategy for America's long-term growth and opportunity in areas such as renewable energy, health care, and education."

Perhaps more incredibly, Obama seems to think that government taking over an economy is a new idea. Or that massive growth in government can take place "with unprecedented transparency and accountability."

Yes, sir, we heard it from Jimmy Carter when he created the Department of Energy, the Synfuels Corporation, and the Department of Education.

Or how about the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 -- The War on Poverty -- which President Johnson said "...does not merely expand old programs or improve what is already being done. It charts a new course. It strikes at the causes, not just the consequences of poverty."

Trillions of dollars later, black poverty is the same. But black families are not, with triple the incidence of single parent homes and out of wedlock births.

It's not complicated. Americans can accept Barack Obama's invitation to move onto the plantation. Or they can choose personal responsibility and freedom.

Does anyone really need to think about what the choice should be?
Quote:
So simple to copy and paste, isn't it?

Much harder to make any cogent commentary on your own opinion of such writings. And a great way to obfuscate and dominate this thread with right-wing pasted on article after article after article rather than debate the merits of your extremist, right-wing, angry and in the minority viewpoints with other posters, now isn't it?

-- WT Reader
Angry? I'm not angry. I'm also not an economist, scientist, engineer, or a doctor, etc. I prefer to read the truth and then spread the word. Take a look at my contributions to this forum and I think you will see that it is you who chooses to inject anger and false charges of racism to try to discredit the truth that the once silent majority of Americans are now awakening to. Personally, I wish you would simply read my posts with an open mind and try to cleanse yourself of your self destructive animosity towards conservative opinion and common sense, in general. Obfuscate? Not me, that's been your domain(cogent commentary.) Why attack me for posting Star Parker's commentary? Might she be a racist and I am just naive? Here's your opportunity to post some cogent commentary to Star Parker's opinion.
ClassicalLib17 Wrote:Angry? I'm not angry. I'm also not an economist, scientist, engineer, or a doctor, etc. I prefer to read the truth and then spread the word. Take a look at my contributions to this forum and I think you will see that it is you who chooses to inject anger and false charges of racism to try to discredit the truth that the once silent majority of Americans are now awakening to. Personally, I wish you would simply read my posts with an open mind and try to cleanse yourself of your self destructive animosity towards conservative opinion and common sense, in general. Obfuscate? Not me, that's been your domain(cogent commentary.) Why attack me for posting Star Parker's commentary? Might she be a racist and I am just naive? Here's your opportunity to post some cogent commentary to Star Parker's opinion.

You posted it, want to hear your cogent commentary upon it. I have already posted three posts here, one on a lawsuit against California State University by an open gov group in California about taxpayers funding the upcoming costly and extravagant excesses of Sister Sarah Palin's scheduled speech...with cogent commentary, not just a blank opinion pice, actual REAl NEWS.

I also posted a pice about a recent CBS NEWS/NY TIMES poll as to who the majority of "Tea Party" activists are who are white, conservative, older and very angry...only 18% of the American public with only 1% of them being people of color. OH, and yes, with cogent commentary.

And I posted a piece about "DON'T FUEL UNHINGED" based upon recent comments President Clinton has made about his concerns for growing violence from the fringe "Tea Party" activists and how they compare to Timothy McVeigh in 1995 and his Oklahoma City BOMBING....with cogent commentary.

So let's hear your cogent commentary on the Parker article you posted here rather than just another cut and paste jobber which you so excel at mostly filling this entire politcal thread.

-- WT Reader
WT, I would provide some cogent commentary on the plight of inner city black families if I were an expert on this subject, but I thought that Star Parker, having been enslaved for a period of her life by white elitist social policy, did a damn good job articulating this issue in her own words. I would never be so presumptuous as to think that I knew more about her life than she. You seem to have an opinion of black conservatives, why don't you share that opinion with the rest of us on this forum? I value your considerable insight.
ClassicalLib17 Wrote:WT, I would provide some cogent commentary on the plight of inner city black families if I were an expert on this subject, but I thought that Star Parker, having been enslaved for a period of her life by white elitist social policy, did a damn good job articulating this issue in her own words. I would never be so presumptuous as to think that I knew more about her life than she. You seem to have an opinion of black conservatives, why don't you share that opinion with the rest of us on this forum? I value your considerable insight.

First, the use of the word "plantation" is offensive to any person of color and should be to all Americans of good-will. The plantation represents bondage, slavery, brutality and cruelty which culminated in the American Civil War, which was at its core a fight about SLAVERY.

I have no idea who Star Parker is, where this asserted article he/she wrote appears as their is NO cite to it, and I withold any further comment upon it until I can see the source of the material, both biographical and when/where it was published.

-- WT Reader
Well, I have to say that I am surprised to hear that you are not aware of the existence of the internet search engine( google, internet explorer, ask.com, etc.) available on the world wide web. But, we won't tell Al Gore, will we. Ha, Ha, I made a joke. Would you like for me to explain how to utilize its wonderful capability to you here, or via private message? I'm feeling all giddy now that you are enlisting my services as your internet tutor. Thank you friend