04-22-2009, 09:04 AM
Again, forum rules - attack the post not the poster.
It is factually correct that your trusted friend is a member of the newly elected board and a member of the 'prior" board. Many positions were approved while he was a member of the prior board. The board acts as one, unless he publicly dissented and cast his vote against every new position, he has no leg to stand on.
Is it now the intent of loyal supporters of their trusted friend board members to state that trusted friends board members cannot be held responsible for actions the board took even when the trusted friend board member was a member of that same board and voted on the issue? Trusted friends that are board members are politicians and are supposed to be held responsible for their actions by citizens. That's how our republic works.
It is factually correct that your trusted friend is a member of the newly elected board and a member of the 'prior" board. Many positions were approved while he was a member of the prior board. The board acts as one, unless he publicly dissented and cast his vote against every new position, he has no leg to stand on.
Is it now the intent of loyal supporters of their trusted friend board members to state that trusted friends board members cannot be held responsible for actions the board took even when the trusted friend board member was a member of that same board and voted on the issue? Trusted friends that are board members are politicians and are supposed to be held responsible for their actions by citizens. That's how our republic works.
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere / Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter / Injustice must be exposed, with all the tension its exposure creates - Martin Luther King Jr.