04-02-2010, 08:01 AM
This seems to be part of the RICO enterprise, 2 innocent men were "Arrested" and placed on a year long trial for media attention and personal gain , as always the public is completely unaware of the facts. In fact on many occasions the public often joined the Stateâs plot for a modern âday hanging. I hope the individuals responsible for drawing-up fake criminal activity for personal agendaâs or just to make the state's attorney's office look important are brought to justice.
One of many fake cases>> the alleged Ghost Payroll Scam!!!! THIS ONE YEAR FAKE CASE COST THE TAX PAYER OVER $250.000 alleging a theft of $2,300??? The Media broke the story as a "ghost pay rolling" of $10.000 and up!!! The true amount is
$2,300 going back two years, this matter should have been discussed among the school District Administrators and problem solved. Many residents express in glowing terms their critical evaluation and person attacks on the two men falsely accused. The two men were deemed guilty before a trial even begun. Most likely, since the public depends on the school system to provide them with the information they use to make decisions, the problem is more than one, not exercising effective oversight over the school systemâs processes.
The public /taxpayers were misled and the District used the Police, States Attorneys and Media as a weapon. The School Board is ultimately responsible for spending LARGE AMOUNTS OF Taxpayers money and not including court cost. When a bureaucrat embarrasses the elected officials who have oversight over him, itâs not uncommon for the career of that bureaucrat to be cut somewhat short. Restoring confidence in the Countyâs Schools officials of District 60. Whose responsibility is probably not an option, but an imperative? The School Board has the position for simply just doing a good job and being honest with the taxpayers/ public. Itâs an object lesson in earned political capital.
The School District did not consult with the subordinateâs supervisor before assuming guilt or going to the Mayorâs Office and Police. DURING court proceedings all the state's witnesses indicated the entire paraprofessional staff was following the same protocol according to the evidence presented in the court room. Which was pointed out by Artleyâs attorney, who indicated why stop at arresting only Mr. Artley and Mr. Williams many of the Stateâs witnesses testified that they would on many occasions deviate shift changes while working second jobs. DURING court proceedings all the state's witness indicated testimony completely different from what the investigating detective stated in his statement narratives. The State held its own witnesses on Perjury charges clearly shows the intent of fraud and malicious prosecution intentions. The entire paraprofessional staff is following the same protocol according to the evidence presented in the court room.
School Board you are the Not consulting with the subordinateâs supervisor before assuming guilt, let along arresting only two men BEFORE conducting interviews with co-workers. DURING court proceedings all the state's witness indicated testimony completely different from what the investigating detective stated in his statement narratives the State claims the witnesses indicated. The State held its own witnesses on Perjury charges. Clearly shows the intent of fraud and malicious prosecution intentions. The entire paraprofessional staff is following the same protocol according to the evidence presented in the court room. To note: NOT one single School administrator joined the States Attorney's claims in the courtroom in her attempts to prosecute these men. Whereâs School board, H.R, Pay roll dept. Such lack of action may spell conspiracy intentions. The judge made very noted remarks regarding that fact doing final remarks and in 5 or 10 minutes he gave a not âGuilty Verdictâ. The wrong people were place on trial and as this develops I hope the real âCrooksâ pay!!!!
One of many fake cases>> the alleged Ghost Payroll Scam!!!! THIS ONE YEAR FAKE CASE COST THE TAX PAYER OVER $250.000 alleging a theft of $2,300??? The Media broke the story as a "ghost pay rolling" of $10.000 and up!!! The true amount is
$2,300 going back two years, this matter should have been discussed among the school District Administrators and problem solved. Many residents express in glowing terms their critical evaluation and person attacks on the two men falsely accused. The two men were deemed guilty before a trial even begun. Most likely, since the public depends on the school system to provide them with the information they use to make decisions, the problem is more than one, not exercising effective oversight over the school systemâs processes.
The public /taxpayers were misled and the District used the Police, States Attorneys and Media as a weapon. The School Board is ultimately responsible for spending LARGE AMOUNTS OF Taxpayers money and not including court cost. When a bureaucrat embarrasses the elected officials who have oversight over him, itâs not uncommon for the career of that bureaucrat to be cut somewhat short. Restoring confidence in the Countyâs Schools officials of District 60. Whose responsibility is probably not an option, but an imperative? The School Board has the position for simply just doing a good job and being honest with the taxpayers/ public. Itâs an object lesson in earned political capital.
The School District did not consult with the subordinateâs supervisor before assuming guilt or going to the Mayorâs Office and Police. DURING court proceedings all the state's witnesses indicated the entire paraprofessional staff was following the same protocol according to the evidence presented in the court room. Which was pointed out by Artleyâs attorney, who indicated why stop at arresting only Mr. Artley and Mr. Williams many of the Stateâs witnesses testified that they would on many occasions deviate shift changes while working second jobs. DURING court proceedings all the state's witness indicated testimony completely different from what the investigating detective stated in his statement narratives. The State held its own witnesses on Perjury charges clearly shows the intent of fraud and malicious prosecution intentions. The entire paraprofessional staff is following the same protocol according to the evidence presented in the court room.
School Board you are the Not consulting with the subordinateâs supervisor before assuming guilt, let along arresting only two men BEFORE conducting interviews with co-workers. DURING court proceedings all the state's witness indicated testimony completely different from what the investigating detective stated in his statement narratives the State claims the witnesses indicated. The State held its own witnesses on Perjury charges. Clearly shows the intent of fraud and malicious prosecution intentions. The entire paraprofessional staff is following the same protocol according to the evidence presented in the court room. To note: NOT one single School administrator joined the States Attorney's claims in the courtroom in her attempts to prosecute these men. Whereâs School board, H.R, Pay roll dept. Such lack of action may spell conspiracy intentions. The judge made very noted remarks regarding that fact doing final remarks and in 5 or 10 minutes he gave a not âGuilty Verdictâ. The wrong people were place on trial and as this develops I hope the real âCrooksâ pay!!!!