Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Read The Fine Print
#4
ClassicalLib17 Wrote:The individual mandate is essential to this gargantuan intrusion on our constitution. What is left when that is removed? I haven't read up on the other constitutional challenges in the lawsuit, but I'm sure you will. I read the explanation to pertain to severability of a legislative veto provision. So, I think you are wrong. This bill doesn't contain a legislative veto provision nor a severability clause. If you think that the liberals on the court don't pay attention to what is happening to European Socialist societies with regards to national healthcare, I think you are deluding yourself, which harms no one but you.
I don't agree with the mandate for health insurance and agree it is most likely unconstitutional. I just wish they would have fixed the part about health insurance companies being allowed to exclude peoplefrom coverage for the least little thing. WHO THE HELL EVER ALLOWED THAT TO HAPPEN IN THE FIRST PLACE. I'll bet it was Republicans.

I feel the same about our mandatory automobile insurance here in Illinois. A person should be allowed to self-insure if they choose. At least if you don't want mandatory auto insurance you can choose not to have it by just not driving certain types of motor vehicles.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Read The Fine Print - by ClassicalLib17 - 05-20-2010, 08:28 AM
Re: Read The Fine Print - by Danno - 05-20-2010, 10:12 AM
Re: Read The Fine Print - by ClassicalLib17 - 05-20-2010, 02:32 PM
Re: Read The Fine Print - by Danno - 05-20-2010, 05:30 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)