04-08-2010, 01:10 PM
Accounting for $2,300 is whatâs in question here according to court proceedings, turning in inaccurate time sheets is one thingâ¦.but blowing the major dollars$$$ to place two security guards on trial and not presenting a shred evidence to support the inaccurate time sheet theory is totally âPreposterousâ. The inaccurate time sheet may have presented a problem in the eyes of the Districtâs administrative proceedings. However, the inaccurate time sheet âloopholeâ didnât show there was anything to hide in a Judicial Judgeâs Circuit Court Room. If there is an administrative violation committed by all means address it, but gather all the facts first before launching a rocket into space⦠LMAO !!!
Which by the way, cost big $$$$$$$$$$$$$. You are correct, thereâs something to hide for sure and itâs not in the pockets of two security guards paychecks. We should question what the real flight behind the mystery ghost-payroll scheme is. Please
there were many Ex- District employees who were canned for miss-appropriation of funds in the major $$$$$$ dollar amount bracket⦠And are currently pocketing millions⦠have not seen an arrest warrant. But by all means letâs place the blame on inaccurate time sheet âloopholeâ theory!!! Maybe if a single District administrator would have joined the Stateâs time sheet loopholeâ theory it wouldnât been a loophole. According to the Judge it was never a dynamic as he pointed out the time sheet did not generate a paycheck. Please donât quote Media clippings you are embarrassing yourself. Everyone knows the media never gets the facts. I guess you didnât know that huh?????
Which by the way, cost big $$$$$$$$$$$$$. You are correct, thereâs something to hide for sure and itâs not in the pockets of two security guards paychecks. We should question what the real flight behind the mystery ghost-payroll scheme is. Please
