05-14-2010, 01:11 AM
A-h-h, bourbon on-the-rocks, do any of you realize it's holistic medicinal value? I thought this article was important for you to read, just like every other article I have posted. Cleanse yourselves of the social justice guilt-trip layed on you by the Progressives. You are an American, damn it, embrace your roots. My 60+ year old elementary school teachers would turn in their graves if they had been forced to deviate from their, tried and true lesson plans, for the crap we allow the educational establishment to feed our youngsters today.
George Soros Funds Free Press Thuggery (And Other Good News)
It's a good life, having idiots hate you.*
Posted by Neil Stevens (Profile)
Friday, May 14th at 1:16AM EDT
2 Comments
Thatâs a pretty good way to describe recent actions from George Soros-paid front groups like Free Press and their band of modern day Bolsheviks.
The Obama Administrationâs effort to expand federal âneutralityâ regulation over the Internet really illustrates, and drives the wedge into, the growing rift in the Democratic Party. Earlier this month, the FCC voted 3-2 (All Democratic appointees voting âyesâ) on a proposal that would for the first time have the federal government regulate the Internet. Republicans opposed the proposal and plenty of thoughtful (or worried) Democrats do, too.
Democrats are critical of Republican opponents, of course, but whatâs fascinating (at least in the way slow-motion car crashes are fascinating) are the increasingly brutal attacks Soros-sponsored front groups are making against other Democrats.
Take the Communications Workers of America. With 700,000 members and a track record of intense support for Democrats, you might think they would be spared the wrath from Sorosâ henchmen. Nope. CWAâs apostasy was to raise a concern that their membersâ jobs might be at risk from net neutrality regulations. For that, Free Press evidently dispatched Art Brodsky at Soros-funded Public Knowledge to accuse the union leadership of being âever-turncoat.â
Meanwhile, two-dozen civil rights groups (including NAACP, LULAC and other well-established Democratic supporters) raised concerns about Net neutrality slowing down broadband deployment in poor neighborhoods. That unleashed the fury of Free Press who dispatched James Rucker, another Free Press acolyte who called the groups a sell-out to the cause of equality.
In March, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and US Coordinator for International Communications and Information Policy Philip Verveer pointed out that US government control of the Internet would make it very difficult for diplomats to tell other countries (like China and Iran?) that they should not try to control the Internet. Net neutrality regulations, he said, âcould be employed as a pretext or as an excuse for undertaking public policy activities that we would disagree with pretty profoundly.â In response to those comments by an Obama appointee, Democrats thought carefully about what they were doing. No, Iâm kidding. Actually, Harold Feld at Public Knowledge penned a venomous piece on HuffingtonPost.com in which he attacked Verveer for being too stupid to understand that he was parroting âRepublican attack bullets.â
The list of these public knifings by Free Press and their fellow travelers against anyone who crosses them could go on and on. Theyâre not making friends. Theyâre hunting heretics.
This is great.
As the late Lee Atwater used to counsel, when your enemy is committing suicide, donât interfere. More than most political issues, Net neutrality is exposing the rifts in the Obama coalition. Union members and minority groups evidently donât take kindly to the Chablis-and-Volvo revolutionaries telling them to move to the back of Obamaâs bus.
Their elitist thuggery is getting more vicious with every passing week â only itâs not against Republicans, itâs against their fellow Democrats.
Free Pressâ desire to âremove brick by brick the entire capitalist system itselfâ seems anachronistic and silly, but their single-minded, militaristic focus on media revolution and contemptuous disregard for the opinions of fellow liberals and Democrats who might disagree is downright dangerous⦠to Democrats.
Conservatives should count our blessings in this ensuing bloodbath. Free Press is doing our work for us â destroying any remaining semblance of cohesion in the Democrat coalition. Their internecine napalm smells likeâ¦. victory!
A funny final thought: On Sorosâ website, his foundation touts its commitment to creating more âvibrant and tolerantâ communities. Maybe that happens after the revolution
George Soros Funds Free Press Thuggery (And Other Good News)
It's a good life, having idiots hate you.*
Posted by Neil Stevens (Profile)
Friday, May 14th at 1:16AM EDT
2 Comments
Thatâs a pretty good way to describe recent actions from George Soros-paid front groups like Free Press and their band of modern day Bolsheviks.
The Obama Administrationâs effort to expand federal âneutralityâ regulation over the Internet really illustrates, and drives the wedge into, the growing rift in the Democratic Party. Earlier this month, the FCC voted 3-2 (All Democratic appointees voting âyesâ) on a proposal that would for the first time have the federal government regulate the Internet. Republicans opposed the proposal and plenty of thoughtful (or worried) Democrats do, too.
Democrats are critical of Republican opponents, of course, but whatâs fascinating (at least in the way slow-motion car crashes are fascinating) are the increasingly brutal attacks Soros-sponsored front groups are making against other Democrats.
Take the Communications Workers of America. With 700,000 members and a track record of intense support for Democrats, you might think they would be spared the wrath from Sorosâ henchmen. Nope. CWAâs apostasy was to raise a concern that their membersâ jobs might be at risk from net neutrality regulations. For that, Free Press evidently dispatched Art Brodsky at Soros-funded Public Knowledge to accuse the union leadership of being âever-turncoat.â
Meanwhile, two-dozen civil rights groups (including NAACP, LULAC and other well-established Democratic supporters) raised concerns about Net neutrality slowing down broadband deployment in poor neighborhoods. That unleashed the fury of Free Press who dispatched James Rucker, another Free Press acolyte who called the groups a sell-out to the cause of equality.
In March, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and US Coordinator for International Communications and Information Policy Philip Verveer pointed out that US government control of the Internet would make it very difficult for diplomats to tell other countries (like China and Iran?) that they should not try to control the Internet. Net neutrality regulations, he said, âcould be employed as a pretext or as an excuse for undertaking public policy activities that we would disagree with pretty profoundly.â In response to those comments by an Obama appointee, Democrats thought carefully about what they were doing. No, Iâm kidding. Actually, Harold Feld at Public Knowledge penned a venomous piece on HuffingtonPost.com in which he attacked Verveer for being too stupid to understand that he was parroting âRepublican attack bullets.â
The list of these public knifings by Free Press and their fellow travelers against anyone who crosses them could go on and on. Theyâre not making friends. Theyâre hunting heretics.
This is great.
As the late Lee Atwater used to counsel, when your enemy is committing suicide, donât interfere. More than most political issues, Net neutrality is exposing the rifts in the Obama coalition. Union members and minority groups evidently donât take kindly to the Chablis-and-Volvo revolutionaries telling them to move to the back of Obamaâs bus.
Their elitist thuggery is getting more vicious with every passing week â only itâs not against Republicans, itâs against their fellow Democrats.
Free Pressâ desire to âremove brick by brick the entire capitalist system itselfâ seems anachronistic and silly, but their single-minded, militaristic focus on media revolution and contemptuous disregard for the opinions of fellow liberals and Democrats who might disagree is downright dangerous⦠to Democrats.
Conservatives should count our blessings in this ensuing bloodbath. Free Press is doing our work for us â destroying any remaining semblance of cohesion in the Democrat coalition. Their internecine napalm smells likeâ¦. victory!
A funny final thought: On Sorosâ website, his foundation touts its commitment to creating more âvibrant and tolerantâ communities. Maybe that happens after the revolution