No Confidence Vote For I.C.E. Department Leadership - Printable Version +- Waukegan Talk (http://wauktalk.com/forum) +-- Forum: Politics (http://wauktalk.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Forum: Politics (http://wauktalk.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: No Confidence Vote For I.C.E. Department Leadership (/showthread.php?tid=1100) |
No Confidence Vote For I.C.E. Department Leadership - ClassicalLib17 - 08-04-2010 Why can't we have honest leadership in our government? It all begins at the local level, and we need to pay close attention. Immigration enforcement union took a no-confidence vote in its leadership By: Joel S. Gehrke Jr. Special to the Examiner 08/04/10 5:35 PM EDT Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents believe overwhelmingly that their department leadership has become so politicized as to compromise the effectiveness of ICE and the safety of American people. Their union has released a letter announcing its recent unanimous âvote of no confidenceâ in ICE agency heads, accusing them of âmisleading the American publicâ regarding illegal immigration in order to further a pro-amnesty agenda. In June, the National Immigration and Customs Enforcement Council â an AFL-CIO affiliate â and affiliated local councils cast a unanimous 259-0 vote of no confidence in ICE Director John Morton and Assistant Director Phyllis Coven. In a letter announcing the vote, the National Council criticized the directors for âmisguided and reckless initiatives,â and said their leaders have âabandoned the Agencyâs core mission of enforcing United States immigration laws and providing for public safety, and have instead directed their attention to campaigning for policies and programs related to amnesty.â Janice Kephart at the Center for Immigration Studies has the letter, which includes several biting indictments of ICE failures by ICE agents. For instance: Senior ICE leadership dedicates more time to campaigning for immigration reforms aimed at large scale amnesty legislation, than advising the American public and Federal lawmakers on the severity of the illegal immigration problem, and the need for more manpower and resources within the ICE ERO to address it. ICE ERO is currently overwhelmed by the massive criminal alien problem in the United States resulting in the large-scale release of criminals back into local communities. Kind of puts the Arizona illegal immigration enforcement in perspective, doesnât it? While ICE reports internally that more than 90 percent of ICE detainees are first encountered in jails after they are arrested by local police for criminal charges, ICE senior leadership misrepresents this information publicly in order to portray ICE detainees as being non-criminal in nature to support the Administrationâs position on amnesty and relaxed security at ICE detention facilities. The majority of ICE ERO Officers are prohibited from making street arrests or enforcing United States immigration laws outside of the institutional (jail) setting. This has effectively created âamnesty through policyâ for anyone illegally in the United States who has not been arrested by another agency for a criminal violation. Good to know. Read more at the Washington Examiner: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/immigration-enforcement-union-took-a-no-confidence-vote-in-its-leadership-99976699.html?utm_source=feedburner+BeltwayConfidential&utm_medium=feed+Beltway+Confidential&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BeltwayConfidential+%28Beltway+Confidential%29feed&utm_content=My+Yahoofeed&utm_term=My+Yahoofeed#ixzz0vhH3yCLx">http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini ... z0vhH3yCLx</a><!-- m --> Re: No Confidence Vote For I.C.E. Department Leadership - WT Reader - 08-05-2010 :roll: |